Sunday, November 12, 2017

Environmental Security: Drowning in Responsibility

          Climate change: a phrase that is all too common yet too infrequently acted upon. For decades scientists have produced hard evidence showing the disastrous effects of climate change and the potential global threat it could become if continuing on the same path. However, nations are too concerned with sacrificing tried and true policies which hurt the economy due to fear for losing in the global market because of newer environmentally safe practices. Though more and more nations are coming forward and declaring a new commitment to clean and renewable energy, questions arise as to what it would take for every nation to confidently step forward and declare full commitment to clean practices. Does it take every nation stepping forward promising to adapt these promises? Does it require a more immediate and dire consequence for not taking steps to fix this global threat? An unfortunate reality is that though we are not under immediate threat of annihilation by environmental forces, the lives of many already are.

             The citizens of Tuvalu are already facing the reality that their homeland may not be habitable within a few decades if the rising water levels do not cease. For being a consequence that is widely known, the melting ice caps pose a threat greater than just polar bears (not that I don't care about polar bears) by threatening many island nations and shorelines with an ever approaching threat. Unfortunately, a common attitude held by people living inland treat rising sea levels as a joke. "More beach front property" is not the reality, less habitable land and a displacement of a living population is. Environmental security is in line with all other forms of security as well, because the displacement of populations means not only the abandonment of national security as the nation will no longer exist as a habitable location, but the ignoring of ontological implications for both the displaced population and the accepting population. The transitioning of culture, language, and traditions is one that cannot be ignored, as undoubtedly history is lost in such a drastic change. Thus, the priority of climate change prevention is to minimize or reduce the effects of global warming if possible.

           International policies and agreements such as the Paris Agreement have attempted to take steps in unifying the globe against the dangers of global warming, but as it stands even with nations standing together, many of the citizens do not. Until the public attitude on energy conservation and aim for renewable energy resources becomes popular, there will be a consistent problem. As it currently stands, lobbying to change reforms originally meant to change energy policy for the bettering of the environment to still aid traditional non-renewable resources is a common occurrence. The only way to truly make a 180 degree turn to change the destiny of our planet is for a large-scale attitude shift towards renewable energy; this shift is necessary for both citizens and corporations. For the safety of the planet, climate change is a threat that needs to be addressed by all, as it is a threat that is for all.

3 comments:

  1. Wow is all I can say! Very inspiring Chase. I think it's extremely important, like you said, that we adopt a new view on climate change because nothing can get done until we all acknowledge climate change as a real threat. Though the majority of people do see it as a threat or at least possible threat, certain top officials do not see the threat. The issue with this is that just because they don't view it as a threat does not mean the problem does't exist. The proof is in the pudding, climate change is real and we need to change our attitude towards it. Fantastic post!
    #polarbearlivesmatter

    ReplyDelete
  2. Chase, I agree with this post. You covered the material well and included your own opinion intertwined within the post. I wish you talked about the many global conventions that have taken place that revolve around climate change. Is there something that these conventions have not covered? Are they coming to a nationwide consensus? If anything, what do you think they should talk about at the next upcoming one? Just some food for thought in order to have a more complete blog post. Great job.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Chase, i liked your blog as you were able to share your opinion while, also backing it up with facts and background on the events surrounding climate change. Furthermore, it was good that you mentioned the conventions surrounding climate change and how they have done virtually nothing to help with climate change.

    ReplyDelete

Security Concerns: Playing Favorites

In my first Security essay, I wrote that social justice security and ontological security were the most important security issues, as they...