Sunday, October 1, 2017

The Rise and Fall of Somali Piracy - Madsen

Daniel Madsen
Professor Shirk
POL 331
10/1/17
The Rise and Fall of Somali Piracy
            It is unbelievable to think that such a small organization would cause such a stir in global security over such a short span of time. Throughout the last twenty years, piracy off the coast of Somalia plagued media headlines and caused many people to shake their heads and asked how this could happen in such modern times. Somalia, a failed state, has a corrupt government that enables piracy. In return, they have been rumored to receive a cut of the stolen money and ransom. Surprisingly enough, piracy actually began as fishermen defending their territory from foreign ships exploiting their coast’s lack of a coast guard. Origins like these are the reason why local Somali villagers and pirates personally feel as if their criminal mischief is justifiable. To study deeper into the reasons of piracy, background knowledge of Somali circumstances must be introduced first.
            Fishing is one of the largest industries in Somalia. Because of such success that the country had experienced, they formed trade partnerships with countries such as Italy and Iraq. However, civil war plagued the nation and as a result their navy was disbanded. The disbanding of the Somali navy was one of the worst things that could have resulted globally from the civil war. Without a navy, the coast began to run rampant with danger and crime. This consisted of foreign vessels operating illegally in their seas, thus overfishing the coast and ruining the Somali economy. The formation of piracy was a result of fighting back what was initially theirs. However, this justification evolved into an excuse for excessive crime on the sea.
            Due to dangerous travel in such a popular area of cargo traffic, many nations have come together to combat piracy in the Gulf of Aden. In 2007, the United Nations Security Council adopted Resolution 1838, an act that required ships travelling through that area to have military personnel on board. While this decision definitely helped combat piracy and was a step in the right direction, it attempts to solve the problem from the wrong side. This is comparable to a patriarchal society combatting sexual assault by teaching women self-defense. While the numbers may drop because of teaching, it still is not solving the root issue of men raping women. The same thing goes towards the problem of piracy. While having military personnel on ships is great for combatting piracy, it still does not get to the root of the problem, and the question that needs to be asked is, “Why are they pirating?”

            The United Nations deciding to arm ships was taking the easy way out of combatting piracy. When a failed state shows so much turmoil internally, it needs help. If it were not for piracy, the world would simply not care about Somalia. We would have no idea about their civil war, their well-being, their terrorist-run Islamic state, and all other plaguing corruption. As a much more fortunate society that we live in, I feel as if it is our duty to bring relief to Somalia and bring their country to stability. Somalia is a beautiful nation that has a lot to offer without piracy.

4 comments:

  1. Hey Dan! Great post! You brought up some great ideas that really makes the reader think. I really liked the whole idea that we need to get to the root of the problem as opposed to quick fixes that really don't fix anything. These quick fixes end up costing more in the long run because more fixes are needed, and as an end result, not much has been fixed. Your comment about how the turmoil in the state needs to be addressed is a great example of how human security is extremely important to national security, that the turmoil could very likely be the root cause of piracy. Overall, great topic and great ideas. 10/10. A+.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Danny! Daniel Madsen. Dan M. My man. You really address the issues and other unknown details surrounding Somali piracy. I wrote on it as well in my blog post and it's cool seeing what else you mentioned. Do you believe the United States should directly intervene? That'd be pretty cool. But how do we increase security on the ocean which is pretty big and hard to cover it all? Those are the big questions you know? Glad to hear what you think! See you at the family reunion!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Danny boy, loved the post. Having always wanted to be I pirate I really relate to this. I like how you added the background to Somali piracy such as how the Navy was actually disbanded and attempted to show how the Coast Gaurd are important (debatable). It was also good that you stated what the "root" of the problem was.

    ReplyDelete
  4. While I agree with your main idea, I think your conclusion/solution is a bit wishy washy. The idea that it is up to us to fix Somalia, and the implication of this that we are able to in the first place, seems hasty. While we may be able to do more as a country, it is certainly not up to us to fix. Piracy in Somalia is, quite frankly, too small an issue for us to prioritize. Furthermore, if for some reason it became a priority, this issue is far too big for us to sweep in and clean up and move on (what attempts of this in the past have gone well anyway?). I definitely agree that the root causes need to be addressed here-but do we really even know what they are? And if so, how are we supposed to address them? Do we have the expertise, the knowledge, the resources?
    I don't believe it is up to the United States to fix this issue, and I don't believe that we are even capable of doing so.

    ReplyDelete

Security Concerns: Playing Favorites

In my first Security essay, I wrote that social justice security and ontological security were the most important security issues, as they...